База результатов деятельности
научных работников ФИЦ ИнБЮМ
Научно-информационный отдел ФИЦ ИнБЮМ
+7 8692 54-55-50
sci-info@marine-research.org

Дата внесения публикации в базу 16-08-2018 11:13 не попадает в период стимулирования 01-09-2019 – 31-08-2020
Статья в периодическом издании

Ocean current connectivity propelling the secondary spread of a marine invasive comb jelly across western Eurasia

WoS 5.958/Q1 SCOPUS 3.786/Q1
DOI 10.1111/geb.12742
Язык Английский
Журнал Global Ecology and Biogeography

ISSN: 1466-822X; Онлайн ISSN: 1466-8238
Год 2018
Выходные данные Том: 27, Выпуск: 7, Страницы: 814–827
Авторы
  1. Jaspers C.
    National Institute of Aquatic Resources, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark (dnk)
  2. Huwer B.
    National Institute of Aquatic Resources, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark (dnk)
  3. Antajan E.
    French Research Institute for the Exploration of the Sea, IFREMER, Boulogne‐sur‐Mer, France (fra)
  4. Hosia A.
    Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway (nor)
    Institute of Marine Research, IMR, Bergen, Norway ()
  5. Hinrichsen H.-H.
    Evolutionary Ecology of Marine Fishes, GEOMAR – Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany (deu)
  6. Biastoch A.
    Theory and Modelling, GEOMAR – Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany (deu)
  7. Angel D.
    Department of Maritime Civilizations, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel (isr)
  8. Asmus R.
    Alfred‐Wegener‐Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, List/Sylt, Germany (deu)
  9. Augustin C.
    Applied Ecology and Phycology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany (deu)
  10. Bagheri S.
    Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Science Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Anzali, Iran (irn)
  11. Beggs S.E.
    Sustainable Agri‐Food Sciences Division, Agri‐Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Belfast, United Kingdom (gbr)
  12. Balsby T.J.S.
    Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (dnk)
  13. Boersma M.
    Alfred‐Wegener‐Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Helgoland, Germany (deu)
  14. Bonnet D.
    Laboratoire MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France (fra)
  15. Christensen J.T.
    Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark (dnk)
  16. Danhardt A.
    IHF, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (deu)
  17. Delpy F.
    Aix Marseille Univ., Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, MIO, Marseille, France (fra)
  18. Falkenhaug T.
    Institute of Marine Research, IMR, Flødevigen, Norway (nor)
  19. Finenko G. A. (Finenko G.)
  20. Fleming N.E.C.
    School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland (irl)
  21. Fuentes V.
    Institute of Marine Sciences, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain (esp)
  22. Galil B.
    The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Israel National Center for Biodiversity Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (isr)
  23. Gittenberger A.
    Gittenberger Marine Research, Inventory & Strategy (GiMaRIS), Leiderdorp, The Netherlands (nld)
    ANEMOON Foundation, Bennebroek, The Netherlands ()
  24. Griffin D.C.
    School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland (irl)
  25. Haslob H.
    Institute for Sea Fisheries, Johann Heinrich von Thünen‐Institute (TI), Hamburg, Germany (deu)
  26. Javidpour J.
    Experimental Ecology I, GEOMAR – Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany (deu)
  27. Kamburska L.
    CNR, Institute of Ecosystem Study, Verbania, Italy (it)
  28. Kube S.
    Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany (deu)
  29. Langenberg V.T.
    Department of sustainable water and soil resources, Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands (nld)
  30. Lehtiniemi M.
    Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE, Marine Research Center, Helsinki, Finland (fin)
  31. Lombard F.
    Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche‐sur‐mer, Sorbonne Universités, Villefranche‐sur‐mer, France (fra)
  32. Malzahn A.
    Alfred‐Wegener‐Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Helgoland, Germany (deu)
  33. Marambio M.
    Institute of Marine Sciences, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain (esp)
  34. Mihneva V.
    Institute of Fishing Resources, Varna, Bulgaria (bfr)
  35. Moller L.F.
    DTU Aqua, Danish Shellfish Centre, Technical University of Denmark, Nykøbing Mors, Denmark (dnk)
  36. Niermann U.
    Marine Ecology, Heiligenhafen, Germany (deu)
  37. Okyar M.I.
    Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Aquatic Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey (tur)
  38. Ozdemir Z.B.
    Faculty of Fisheries, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey (tur)
  39. Pitois S.
    Division of Environment and Ecosystems (Pelagic Science), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, United Kingdom (gbr)
  40. Reusch T.B.H.
  41. Robbens J.
    Evolutionary Ecology of Marine Fishes, GEOMAR – Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany (deu)
  42. Stefanova K.
    Marine Biology and Ecology Department, Institute of Oceanology, BAS, Varna, Bulgaria (bfr)
  43. Thibault D.
  44. van der Veer H.W.
    Aix Marseille Univ., Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, MIO, Marseille, France (fra)
  45. Vansteenbrugge L.
    Aquatic Environment and Quality, Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Oostende, Belgium (bel)
  46. van Walraven L.
    Department of Coastal Systems, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht University, Texel, The Netherlands (nld)
  47. Wozniczka A.
    Department of Fisheries Oceanography and Marine Ecology, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, Poland (pol)
Даты Поступила в редакцию: 26.06.2017
После доработки 02.02.2018
Принята к публикации: 15.02.2018
Абстракт Aim: Invasive species are of increasing global concern. Nevertheless, the mechanisms driving further distribution after the initial establishment of non-native species remain largely unresolved, especially in marine systems. Ocean currents can be a major driver governing range occupancy, but this has not been accounted for in most invasion ecology studies so far. We investigate how well initial establishment areas are interconnected to later occupancy regions to test for the potential role of ocean currents driving secondary spread dynamics in order to infer invasion corridors and the sourcesink dynamics of a non-native holoplanktonic biological probe species on a continental scale. Location: Western Eurasia. Time period: 1980s2016. Major taxa studied: Comb jelly Mnemiopsis leidyi. Methods: Based on 12,400 geo-referenced occurrence data, we reconstruct the invasion history of M. leidyi in western Eurasia. We model ocean currents and calculate their stability to match the temporal and spatial spread dynamics with large-scale connectivity patterns via ocean currents. Additionally, genetic markers are used to test the predicted connectivity between subpopulations. Results: Ocean currents can explain secondary spread dynamics, matching observed range expansions and the timing of first occurrence of our holoplanktonic non-native biological probe species, leading to invasion corridors in western Eurasia. In northern Europe, regional extinctions after cold winters were followed by rapid recolonizations at a speed of up to 2,000 km per season. Source areas hosting year-round populations in highly interconnected regions can re-seed genotypes over large distances after local extinctions. Main conclusions: Although the release of ballast water from container ships may contribute to the dispersal of non-native species, our results highlight the importance of ocean currents driving secondary spread dynamics. Highly interconnected areas hosting invasive species are crucial for secondary spread dynamics on a continental scale. Invasion risk assessments should consider large-scale connectivity patterns and the potential source regions of non-native marine species. 2018 The Authors Global Ecology and Biogeography Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Ключевые слова: biological invasions, gelatinous zooplankton, invasion corridors, invasive species, jellyfish, marine connectivity, Mnemiopsis leidyi, range expansion, source populations, sourcesink dynamics, Ctenophora (coelenterates), Mnemiopsis leidyi, Scyphozoa
URL https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050569286&doi=10.1111%2fgeb.12742&partnerID=40&md5=0ebc732af1d2fd363c4371d4de98ec60

Запись создана: 16-08-2018 11:13
Последнее изменение: 05-01-2019 14:39

Библиографическая ссылка:
Jaspers C., Huwer B., Antajan E., Hosia A., Hinrichsen H.-H., Biastoch A., Angel D., Asmus R., Augustin C., Bagheri S., Beggs S.E., Balsby T.J.S., Boersma M., Bonnet D., Christensen J.T., Danhardt A., Delpy F., Falkenhaug T., Finenko G., Fleming N.E.C., Fuentes V., Galil B., Gittenberger A., Griffin D.C., Haslob H., Javidpour J., Kamburska L., Kube S., Langenberg V.T., Lehtiniemi M., Lombard F., Malzahn A., Marambio M., Mihneva V., Moller L.F., Niermann U., Okyar M.I., Ozdemir Z.B., Pitois S., Reusch T.B.H., Robbens J., Stefanova K., Thibault D., van der Veer H.W., Vansteenbrugge L., van Walraven L., Wozniczka A. Ocean current connectivity propelling the secondary spread of a marine invasive comb jelly across western Eurasia // Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2018. Vol. 27, iss. 7. P. 814-827. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12742
[WoS 5.958/Q1][SCOPUS 3.786/Q1]
Экспертное заключение: –
Индексация:
Web of Science
Статус
Да
Импакт-фактор/Квартиль(год)
5.958/Q1 (2017)
Идентификатор
000439785700005
SCOPUS
Статус
Да
Импакт-фактор/Квартиль(год)
3.786/Q1 (2017)
Идентификатор
2-s2.0-85050569286
РИНЦ
Статус
Нет
Идентификатор

Публикация отнесена к госзаданию:
Тема АААА-А18-118021490093-4 «Функциональные, метаболические и токсикологические аспекты существования гидробионтов и их популяций в биотопах с различным физико-химическим режимом»